I am buying a new build apartment in Washington and my lawyer is advising me that she is duty bound to the bank to reveal incentives from the builder. The Estate Agents are hassling me to sign contracts and I would rather not prolong deal. is my lawyer playing by the book?
You should not exchange unless you have been advised to do so by your solicitor. A precondition to being on a mortgage company panel is to comply with the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook requirements. The CML Conveyancing Handbook requires that your lawyer have the appropriate Disclosure of Incentive form completed by the developer and accepted by your lender.
In what way does my ID and proof of funds have anything to do with my conveyancing in Washington? Why is this being asked of me?
You are right in these requests have nothing to do with conveyancing in Washington. However these days you can not proceed with any conveyancing process if you have not providing proof of your identity. Ordinarily this takes the form of a either your passport or driving licence as well as a utility bill. Please note that if you are supplying your driving licence as evidence of identification it must be both the paper section as well as the photo card part, one is not satisfactory in the absence of the other.
Evidence of your source of funds is necessary in accordance with the Money Laundering Regulations. You should not be offended when you are asked to produce this as your lawyer will need to retain this information on file. Your Washington conveyancing practitioner will require evidence of proof of funds before they are able to accept any money from you into their client account and they may also ask additional queries concerning the origin of monies.
I need some quick conveyancing in Washington as I have pressure to exchange contracts in less than one month. A mortgage is not required. Can I decline from having conveyancing searches to save money and time?
As you are are a cash purchaser you are at free not to do searches although no lawyer would advise that you don't. Drawing on years of experience of conveyancing in Washington the following are instances of what can show up and adversely affect future saleability: Enforcement Notices, Outstanding Charges, Overdue Grants, Road Schemes,...
I have been sourcing a conveyancing lawyer in Washington for my home move. Is it possible to check a firm’s complaints history with the legal regulator?
Members of the public can review published Solicitor Regulator Association (SRA) decisions arising from inquisitions from 2008 onwards. Visit Check a solicitor's record. For details about the period before 1 January 2008, or to check a firm's record, telephone 0870 606 2555, 08.00 - 18.00 Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and 09.30 - 18.00 Tuesday. For callers outside the UK, dial +44 (0)121 329 6800. The regulator could monitor telephone calls for training reasons.
I am tempted by the attractive purchase price for a couple of flats in Washington which have in the region of fifty years left on the lease term. Will this present a problem?
There are no two ways about it. A leasehold flat in Washington is a wasting asset as a result of the reducing lease term. The nearer the lease gets to zero years unexpired, the more it reduces the marketability of the premises. For most purchasers and banks, leases with under eighty years become less and less attractive. On a more upbeat note, leaseholders can extend their leases by serving a Section 42 Notice. One stipulation is that they must have owned the premises for two years (unlike a Section 13 notice for purchasing the freehold, when leaseholders can participate from day one of ownership). When successful, they will have the right to an extension of 90 years to the current term and ground rent is effectively reduced to zero. Before moving forward with a purchase of premises with a short lease term remaining you should talk to a solicitor specialising in lease extensions and leasehold enfranchisement. We are are happy to put you in touch with Washington conveyancing experts who will explain the options available to you during an initial telephone conversation free of charge. More often than not it is possible to negotiate informally with the freeholder to extend the lease. They may agree to a smaller lump sum and an increase in the ground rent, but to shorter extension terms in return. You need to ensure that any new terms represent good long-term value compared with the standard benefits of the Section 42 Notice and that onerous clauses are not inserted into any redrafting of the lease.
Leasehold Conveyancing in Washington - A selection of Questions you should ask Prior to buying
-
The answer will be helpful as a) areas can result in problems for the building as the communal areas may start to deteriorate where maintenance are not paid for b) if the leasehold owners have a dispute with the running of the building you will wish to have all the details Who takes charge for maintaining and repairing the building? How many of the leaseholders are in arrears for their service charge payments?
Developers have suggested I use a solicitor and I've obtained a quote from them. They are almost two hundred pounds cheaper than my preferred Washington solicitor. What's the catch?
Developers often have lists of conveyancing practitioners who expedite matters and who know the seller’s paperwork and conveyancing practitioner. As many developers offer an incentive to use a preferred solicitor for this reason, any increased charges can be avoided and a builder will not suggest a conveyancing factory and run the risk of having the conveyancing stall when they demand an exchange inside a month. A counter-argument for not opting for the recommended property lawyer is that they may be reluctant to fight for your interests at the risk of alienating the developer. If you worry that this may be the case you should keep with your high street Washington conveyancer.